RE: [PHP] Articles system
| From: | WeberSites LTD | Date: | Tue, 08 May 2007 19:57:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] Articles system | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-254595@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I get your point.
Most of the content on the site is UGC. I didn't write it,
I just send a link to it if I think it can help. 99% of the
people on this list don't know that the site is mine.
So what about a good article system? :)
berber
-----Original Message-----
From: Stut [mailto:stuttle@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 9:51 PM
To: WeberSites LTD
Cc: ceo@l-i-e.com; 'Robert Cummings'; 'Lester Caine';
php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Articles system
WeberSites LTD wrote:
> 1st, I never said I was any authority about anything :) I'm just
> building the weber sites as a hobby...
Hobby or not, when you publish information on the web without a big message
saying "I have no frickin' idea what I'm talking about", you are presenting
yourself as an authority on the subject. And when you answer questions on a
mailing list with links to your site you are re-enforcing that point.
> 2nd, I beg to disagree. Validation has allot to do with how pages
> look. In many cases, if you have differences between browsers, or if
> things don't look like you expect, validating the page solves the
> problem.
That's as may be, but it doesn't mean validation guarantees it'll render
"correctly", or even as you expect.
-Stut
> I think we are a bit OT here :)
> I was looking to replace my article system and it looks like many
> people prefer to see the one that I have now.
>
> I'll look at the feedback people post here and decide what to do.
>
> Thanks to everyone on the input.
>
> berber
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stut [mailto:stuttle@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 9:34 PM
> To: WeberSites LTD
> Cc: ceo@l-i-e.com; 'Robert Cummings'; 'Lester Caine';
> php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Articles system
>
> WeberSites LTD wrote:
>> Not sure why it's not working with FF. the page passes validation at
>> validator.w3.org.
>
> Validation has never and will never mean it looks right. And it
> worries me that someone presenting themselves as an authority on web
> development would think so.
>
> -Stut
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Richard Lynch [mailto:ceo@l-i-e.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 8:45 PM
>> To: WeberSites LTD
>> Cc: 'Robert Cummings'; 'Lester Caine'; php-general@lists.php.net
>> Subject: RE: [PHP] Articles system
>>
>> On Tue, May 8, 2007 1:13 pm, WeberSites LTD wrote:
>>> This is interesting.
>>> I wonder if more people feel the same.
>>>
>>> Compare the articles on weberdev.com (my site) :
>>> Example : http://www.weberdev.com/ViewArticle/486
>> Completely un-usable on Firefox 1.5.0.5 with current Gentoo Linux.
>>
>> I've got a full-width blue screen of death, and then a 1-inch (?)
>> column of text (unreaedable) off screen to the right.
>>
>> I *would* like this better, if the layout actually worked.
>>
>>> To the articles on devarticles.com for example.
>>>
>>> http://www.devarticles.com/c/a/Java/Getting-Started-with-Java-2D/
>> There's an article on that page?
>>
>> Where?
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Honestly, I can almost always find the same content on a site with
>> much lower ad density, and will always choose a cleaner simple site
>> over something that cluttered/messy.
>>
>> --
>> Some people have a "gift" link here.
>> Know what I want?
>> I want you to buy a CD from some indie artist.
>> http://cdbaby.com/browse/from/lynch
>> Yeah, I get a buck. So?
>>
>> --
>> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit:
>> http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>