RE: [PHP] Articles system

From: Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 19:57:44 +0000
Subject: RE: [PHP] Articles system
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-254595@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I get your point. Most of the content on the site is UGC. I didn't write it, I just send a link to it if I think it can help. 99% of the people on this list don't know that the site is mine. So what about a good article system? :) berber -----Original Message----- From: Stut [mailto:stuttle@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 9:51 PM To: WeberSites LTD Cc: ceo@l-i-e.com; 'Robert Cummings'; 'Lester Caine'; php-general@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP] Articles system WeberSites LTD wrote: > 1st, I never said I was any authority about anything :) I'm just > building the weber sites as a hobby... Hobby or not, when you publish information on the web without a big message saying "I have no frickin' idea what I'm talking about", you are presenting yourself as an authority on the subject. And when you answer questions on a mailing list with links to your site you are re-enforcing that point. > 2nd, I beg to disagree. Validation has allot to do with how pages > look. In many cases, if you have differences between browsers, or if > things don't look like you expect, validating the page solves the > problem. That's as may be, but it doesn't mean validation guarantees it'll render "correctly", or even as you expect. -Stut > I think we are a bit OT here :) > I was looking to replace my article system and it looks like many > people prefer to see the one that I have now. > > I'll look at the feedback people post here and decide what to do. > > Thanks to everyone on the input. > > berber > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stut [mailto:stuttle@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 9:34 PM > To: WeberSites LTD > Cc: ceo@l-i-e.com; 'Robert Cummings'; 'Lester Caine'; > php-general@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP] Articles system > > WeberSites LTD wrote: >> Not sure why it's not working with FF. the page passes validation at >> validator.w3.org. > > Validation has never and will never mean it looks right. And it > worries me that someone presenting themselves as an authority on web > development would think so. > > -Stut > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Richard Lynch [mailto:ceo@l-i-e.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 8:45 PM >> To: WeberSites LTD >> Cc: 'Robert Cummings'; 'Lester Caine'; php-general@lists.php.net >> Subject: RE: [PHP] Articles system >> >> On Tue, May 8, 2007 1:13 pm, WeberSites LTD wrote: >>> This is interesting. >>> I wonder if more people feel the same. >>> >>> Compare the articles on weberdev.com (my site) : >>> Example : http://www.weberdev.com/ViewArticle/486 >> Completely un-usable on Firefox 1.5.0.5 with current Gentoo Linux. >> >> I've got a full-width blue screen of death, and then a 1-inch (?) >> column of text (unreaedable) off screen to the right. >> >> I *would* like this better, if the layout actually worked. >> >>> To the articles on devarticles.com for example. >>> >>> http://www.devarticles.com/c/a/Java/Getting-Started-with-Java-2D/ >> There's an article on that page? >> >> Where? >> >> :-) >> >> Honestly, I can almost always find the same content on a site with >> much lower ad density, and will always choose a cleaner simple site >> over something that cluttered/messy. >> >> -- >> Some people have a "gift" link here. >> Know what I want? >> I want you to buy a CD from some indie artist. >> http://cdbaby.com/browse/from/lynch >> Yeah, I get a buck. So? >> >> -- >> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: >> http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >

« previous php.general (#254595) next »