Re: Just to prove my point (used to be -> Re: [PHP] People's misbehavior on the list)
| From: | Tijnema | Date: | Fri, 18 May 2007 22:34:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Just to prove my point (used to be -> Re: [PHP] People's misbehavior on the list) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-255210@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 5/19/07, Jim Lucas <lists@cmsws.com> wrote:
Jim Lucas wrote: PHP Developer wrote:Ok, so gmail is broken, lets spam google :) TijnemaClients that rely on the subject to determine if it a new thread are broken. In fact, if you looked the headers of your email you will see a line like this message-id: <757360.51350.qm@web57910.mail.re3.yahoo.com> my client takes that line and make a reference to it like this. references: <757360.51350.qm@web57910.mail.re3.yahoo.com> it will also create a new message-id: line. something like this. message-id: <d8269d910705181310k1f1416efq8ef7b77e793d77b6@mail.gmail.com> if anybody replies to my message, the process is repeated. Real, non-broken, email clients rely on the above lines to determine how messages belong to one another. Again, it has nothing to do with the subject line. Look at the subject line of this message. If the email client started a new thread for my last message, then your email client broken.some people don't remove the "Re:" prefix when answering to the questions It opens a new topic on the list and that's not appropriate . Thank ya---------------------------------Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.Sounds like a Jeff Foxworthy joke...-- Jim Lucas