Re: Is the GD module standard?
| From: | itoctopus | Date: | Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:04:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Is the GD module standard? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-256044@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
The GD module is an option that most sys admins install with php (It also
installs by default on OS such as Centos, Ubuntu, etc...)
--
itoctopus - http://www.itoctopus.com
"Dave M G" <martin@autotelic.com> wrote in message
news:46638B56.2080204@autotelic.com...
> PHP General,
>
> I have been using the imagepng() function in my local testing environment
> for a while now to make CAPTCHA images.
>
> In my testing environment, I hadn't done any customization to my PHP set
> up. I went with the default set of installation options that Ubuntu offers
> for a LAMP server.
>
> Recently, I uploaded my site to a web hosting server, and the CAPTCHA
> would not display.
>
> At first, I didn't understand that it was a module issue, because I
> thought the imagepng() function was standard in PHP.
>
> However, by using the phpinfo() command on my hosting service, I realized
> they don't have the GD module installed.
>
> So my assumption that imagepng() will be available on any standard
> installation of PHP is wrong.
>
> However, I'm surprised that it wouldn't be as common as, say, the MySQL
> module.
>
> Is it that my Ubuntu installation comes with an unusual amount of bells
> and whistles? Is it that my web hosting server is lacking in what can be
> expected for standard PHP features?
>
> I want to write code that most people can expect to run on their hosting
> services without having to reconfigure their PHP installation. So, can I
> expect that most servers would have the GD module? If not, what do people
> usually do to manipulate images?
>
> Thank you for any advice.
>
> --
> Dave M G
> Ubuntu Feisty 7.04
> Kernel 2.6.20-15-386