Re: Re: Re: php-cli vs python OT

From: Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:36:47 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Re: php-cli vs python OT
Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-256324@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 6/7/07, Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 16:19 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote: On 6/7/07, Abdullah Ramazanoglu <ar018@yahoo.com> wrote:
    If I'm not completely mistaken, I think that Python can even
interface with the GNOME libraries. PHP could theoretically do that, as well, if someone went through and created extensions for it all.
    PHP is an excellent command-line interpreter, in my opinion.  I'd
say that, in all of my day-to-day PHP programming, about 60% of the code is for the web, with 35% being run from the command line, and 5% magically disappearing, to loud screams of frustration and broken coffee mugs. I had one of those little screams yesterday when I started using the PHP's id3 lib when I realized it's crap because it can't delete or write version 2 tags. Fortunately I found a nice user comment pointing me to the PHP implemented getid3 lib. An hour later my mp3 collection (several thousand ripped from my own CD collection of course :) had nice ID3 tags based on the directories and filenames I had created a few years ago. Wasn't an issue when I was using XMMS but I just switched to Amarok and it makes extensive sensible use of ID3 tags :) Cheers, Rob. -- .------------------------------------------------------------. | InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com | :------------------------------------------------------------: | An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting | | a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services | | such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for       |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily.          |
`------------------------------------------------------------'
Rob, Are you using Amarok on Windows, Linux, or other? I have Amarok 1.3.1 on KDE 3.4.2 on Mandriva 2006.0 Community on 2.6.12-12mdksmp on an i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.60GHz w/ 1GB RAM on a desk with a bunch of crap on it, and all it does is crash for me. I use Totem instead, occasionally using xine for audio, and usually for video (different subject). Just wondering how stable Amarok is for you. -- Daniel P. Brown [office] (570-) 587-7080 Ext. 272 [mobile] (570-) 766-8107

« previous php.general (#256324) next »