RE: [PHP] PHP list as a blog
| From: | Robert Cummings | Date: | Thu, 12 Jul 2007 01:13:20 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] PHP list as a blog | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-258664@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 17:51 -0500, Richard Lynch wrote:
> On Wed, June 13, 2007 3:04 pm, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > But you might not. It depends on what you decide to include() instead
> > of
> > redirecting. I guess in the included source you could code aorund not
> > having the correct URL parameters and default to something sensible,
> > but
> > that still doesn't address the content/request mismatch.
>
> Bought a house, and I've been away from the list, so I'm resurrecting
> this only to point out...
>
> As far as I'm concerned, if it requires a login to see X, and you ask
> for X and aren't logged in, seeing the login page with the URL X *IS*
> the perfectly valid answer for what you should see.
>
> If I needed Google to index my content that requires a login, then I
> don't need a login because that's just a plain silly setup...
>
> Google's gonna have a bunch of pages that users can't see unless they
> login?
>
> Then it's not a login; It's a scam to collect a bunch of user data.
>
> :-) :-) :-)
>
> PS
> And I could just look at the Google User Agent and not require login
> for that, which anybody could forge, but so what? They'll get the
> same damn info by knowing what to search for in Google anyway, if I'm
> giving Google the content without a login.
I guess what you're suggesting is a lot like using a relative URL in a
redirect... it works, it saves some time, but it's not quite right ;)
Cheers,
Rob.
--
...........................................................
SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com
Leveraging the buying power of the masses!
...........................................................