Re: Rules of Engagement

On Sat, July 28, 2007 11:37 pm, Larry Garfield wrote: > Amen! A public discussion list (such as this one) really should have > Reply-To > set correctly. All of the arguments against Reply-To headers apply > only to > the 1% of the population still using mail clients written in the early > 90s. The mistake of accidentaly addressing ALL with a [ahem] rude or private comment is not client-specific nor limited in time. > I'd love to not get double copies of every bloody reply to every > thread I'm > involved in. It's just a waste of electrons and of my time. You mean all y'all that it bothers haven't hacked a PHP IMAP script to login, detect duplicates, and delete the bothersome ones?... :-) -- Some people have a "gift" link here. Know what I want? I want you to buy a CD from some indie artist. http://cdbaby.com/browse/from/lynch Yeah, I get a buck. So?