Re: using disable_functions silently

On Thu, August 23, 2007 12:58 pm, Samuel Vogel wrote: > That'd be at least some kind of a solution. > I'm thinking of overwriting the functions I want to block with one, > that > just returns true and does nothing. > How would I do that? Errrr. You don't. Well, okay, you *COULD* install the "Run-Kit" extension and then you can over-ride whatever you want, I think. Maybe not language constructs like 'if' and 'echo' and 'include' but any function. Note that "Run-Kit" on a production server is probably NOT a Good Idea in a very big way, as any user who knows you have it installed could do things way way way worse than running 'exec'... Like the could re-defined 'exec' after you defined it, and define it to whatever they want. I think. -- Some people have a "gift" link here. Know what I want? I want you to buy a CD from some indie artist. http://cdbaby.com/browse/from/lynch Yeah, I get a buck. So?