Re: Looking for ways to prevent timeout
| From: | Jon Westcot | Date: | Mon, 05 Nov 2007 07:46:55 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Looking for ways to prevent timeout | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-264040@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Nathan:
No, I'm not familiar with Ajax. Where can I read up on it? More
important, how can I find out if Ajax is implemented on the server? Or is
it something I can add myself?
Thanks again,
Jon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Nobbe" <quickshiftin@gmail.com>
To: "Jon Westcot" <jon@westcot.net>
Cc: "PHP General" <php-general@lists.php.net>
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Looking for ways to prevent timeout
> On 11/4/07, Jon Westcot <jon@westcot.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all:
> >
> > I'm hoping to find a solution to the problem I'm having with my
script
> > timing out while inserting records into a table.
> >
> > Overall, the process is pretty fast, which is impressive, but when
it
> > gets to the 22,000 to 23,000 record mark, it seems to time out. I've
had it
> > get up over 26,000 so far, but nothing better than that. And I only
need to
> > process around 30,000 right now.
> >
> > I've tried setting max_execution_time to 1800; no improvement. The
> > value for max_input_time is -1, which, if I understood it correcctly, is
the
> > same as saying no limit. And I've tried calling set_time_limit() with
both
> > 0 and with 360, none of which seemed to help.
> >
> > Is there ANY WAY to increase the amount of time I can use when
running
> > a script that will work? I've tried everything I can find in the PHP
> > manual.
> >
> > Any help you can provide will be greatly appreciated!
>
>
> are you familiar with ajax ?
> i would build some client side tool that would split the job into a series
> of requests.
> say, you input 20,000; then the script fires off 5 requests, to do 4000
> inserts a piece.
> you could easily implement a status bar and it would be guaranteed to
work.
> also, it would scale just about as high as you can imagine.
>
> -nathan
>