Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 4 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net
| From: | Børge Holen | Date: | Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:05:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 4 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-266790@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Saturday 05 January 2008 16:31:49 Daniel Brown wrote:
> Had everything gone as it was supposed to, I think it would've
> been welcomed with open arms. Unfortunately, my stupid ass flipped
> the wrong flag while testing for approximately an hour, which sent
> posts to the list every minute for one hour. However, they weren't
> coming through at the time, and I didn't realize that they were even
> being sent, because the address was not subscribed at the time. Once
> the address was subscribed, all of the messages must've been held in a
> queue on the mailing list side, and were then distributed.
>
> This leads me to ask, why? Isn't this a really Bad Idea[tm] to
> hold posts in queue, pending confirmation of the sender's address? I
> can understand one message, but any more than that shouldn't be
> necessary. My intentions were just to add something "neat" to the
> list for the regulars (which will work as expected now), but what if
> someone had truly malicious intentions? What if hundreds or thousands
> of emails were sent and held in queue, and then the sender's address
> confirmed? Would the mailing list software even be able to handle
> that much of a queue?
>
I wonder... what you try to do seems like a trivial task, or just task, where
did you go wrong to make it send all those mails?
just some personal interrest...
> --
> Daniel P. Brown
> [Phone Numbers Go Here!]
> [They're Hidden From View!]
>
> If at first you don't succeed, stick to what you know best so that you
> can make enough money to pay someone else to do it for you.
--
---
Børge Holen
http://www.arivene.net