Re: uh oh, I defined a resoruce
| From: | Naz Gassiep | Date: | Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:41:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: uh oh, I defined a resoruce | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-267169@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
God, I'm glad you're not in charge of decision-making on any issues that affect me :P - Naz.While "global variables are good" in quotes did not return any results from Google, "global variables are evil" in quotes only returned a result set of 4: Results *1* - *4* of *4* for *" global<http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=dict&ei=-nyGR539MKjIgQT1hKC7Bg&sig2=Gorx1ErPpjplcNDVa0qb6g&q=http://www.answers.com/global%26r%3D67&usg=AFQjCNFszs4YfNg7ok3-m08IgyrhO5EAsQ> variable<http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=dict&ei=-nyGR539MKjIgQT1hKC7Bg&sig2=vCOY79teeScIcrxuvb6k3g&q=http://www.answers.com/variable%26r%3D67&usg=AFQjCNEzQBZwfNnJ4pr1pnYOXYttJJNkvg>are evil<http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=dict&ei=-nyGR539MKjIgQT1hKC7Bg&sig2=eh8-cXxXIwGuHRJhXG2REQ&q=http://www.answers.com/evil%26r%3D67&usg=AFQjCNHcgNJwcVKoYcSB_Ks5OMr4LnAXWw> "* ** Hardly an overwhelming argument by using search results as a measure. DavidNevermind. I forgot the 's'. Once again: Personalized Results *1* - *8* of *8* for *"global<http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=dict&ei=joCGR9SjMp2wgATIv4HWBg&sig2=RNnAskxl87Jpwe85XDzyvg&q=http://www.answers.com/global%26r%3D67&usg=AFQjCNFkKRqMEPNyoEfdOeatXZo5_51d5Q> variables<http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=dict&ei=joCGR9SjMp2wgATIv4HWBg&sig2=b_YKTOej3C0R3RD0QrZUwA&q=http://www.answers.com/variables%26r%3D67&usg=AFQjCNGXzEwYW9a5HoADskUH1aTT5OIvsg>are good<http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=dict&ei=joCGR9SjMp2wgATIv4HWBg&sig2=L-Je5IAp1doAPCeTovvqwA&q=http://www.answers.com/good%26r%3D67&usg=AFQjCNG9Bm-38XQxaR5w7aHA_cDvLT1nSw> "*. (*0.17* seconds) Personalized Results *1* - *10* of about *136* for *"global<http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=dict&ei=xYCGR-TiK4fcgASYpOi2Bg&sig2=ntdSUwxo_P-rplOA3PKNrw&q=http://www.answers.com/global%26r%3D67&usg=AFQjCNE2teAhA638GVYsBxeBxb9z0iYi5A> variables<http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=dict&ei=xYCGR-TiK4fcgASYpOi2Bg&sig2=zCmKFYtnVoOQlWKrXcLqdw&q=http://www.answers.com/variables%26r%3D67&usg=AFQjCNEEdMRqxKMgkWXftVCWfE4kZr98jg>are evil<http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=dict&ei=xYCGR-TiK4fcgASYpOi2Bg&sig2=HxVB1-BREdrmjuSHo6E9jQ&q=http://www.answers.com/evil%26r%3D67&usg=AFQjCNErEUXMUFMcXbjo95hRT2t8pzkISg> "*. (*0.07* seconds Ok. So those of us who use globals are 17 time more likely to end up in hell. I can live with those odds. David