Re: first php 5 class
| From: | Greg Donald | Date: | Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:29:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: first php 5 class | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-268357@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Jan 30, 2008 11:56 AM, Nathan Nobbe <quickshiftin@gmail.com> wrote:
> i love how the ruby crew has 1 framework, whereas php has scads.
Ruby has 7 frameworks that I know of: Nitro, IOWA, Ramaze, Cerise,
Ruby on Rails, Merb and Camping.
http://www.nitroproject.org/
http://enigo.com/projects/iowa/
http://ramaze.net/
http://cerise.rubyforge.org/
http://www.rubyonrails.org/
http://www.merbivore.com/
http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/camping
The most popular PHP frameworks are Rails clones it seems. Zend's
best effort at a framework is an almost direct copy of the Mojavi
framework.
Further, if the number frameworks a language has is any measure of
that's language's quality or capabilities (clue: it isn't) then why
aren't you a Java guy? It clearly has _more_ frameworks.
> php affords the power of choice.
> and last time i checked, php was a lot faster:
>
>
> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all
That benchmark doesn't include Ruby 1.9.
> also, if you want to see some code generation, php-style, check out propel
Propel still uses XML last I messed with it. Yaml is a lot better for
similar tasks. The syntax is a lot smaller which makes it a lot
faster than XML. Perfect example of an advance in web technology.
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/