Re: Doctrine vs. Propel
| From: | Zoltán Németh | Date: | Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:43:43 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Doctrine vs. Propel | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-268715@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
2008. 02. 4, hétfő keltezéssel 14.03-kor Nathan Nobbe ezt írta:
> On Feb 4, 2008 1:44 PM, AmirBehzad Eslami <behzad.eslami@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear List,
> >
> > I've just heard of ORM (Object Relational Mapping) frameworks written for
> > PHP.
> > It seems that there are two major frameworks here: Doctrine and Propel:
> >
> > http://www.phpdoctrine.org/
> > http://propel.phpdb.org/trac/
> >
> > I wonder which one is better? What is the difference between these?
> > I'm talking about the learning curve, peroformance.
> > What are the advantages/disadvantages of each one?
>
>
> hmm... i havent seen this doctrine yet; it looks pretty cool.
> actually, they seem to be somewhat similar. some things ive noticed
> are doctrine uses yaml in its schema files, and doctrine appears to have
> a caching mechanism already for both queries and results. thats nice,
> because for propel youll have to roll your own. unless perhaps symphony
> has done this already ?
symfony AFAIK only has file caching on its own
greets
Zoltán Németh
> also, propel doesnt have anything like DQL. i have to say, doctrine has
> some
> killer docs as well. these appear to be more robust than what propel has at
> a
> cursory glance.
> ill probly take a closer look at this as time permits; thanks for the info!
>
> -nathan