Re: Poll: phpt or phpunit and why?

From: Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:20:51 +0000
Subject: Re: Poll: phpt or phpunit and why?
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-268808@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Feb 6, 2008 1:32 PM, Nathan Nobbe <quickshiftin@gmail.com> wrote: > in a conversation on #gentoo-php (irc), the following distinction > was drawn, > > " back on the phpt; just curious, how do you see it compared to something > like phpunit ? > comparable, or different.." > > " different... phpt is probably really mostly intended for testing php and > their extensions > phpunit rather for testing code written in php" > > -nathan > This might be of interest: http://talks.somabo.de/200703_montreal_need_for_testing.pdf You can also see his other talks here: http://talks.somabo.de/ Right now I use Simpletest because I'm heavily invested in it. PHPUnit is looking better every day though... :)

« previous php.general (#268808) next »