Re: Re: temporary error

On 2/22/08, tedd <tedd.sperling@gmail.com> wrote: > Shouldn't the reason why we ask "if" be sufficient proof that "it > is"? I don't believe having an interrogative nature proves existence in God, no. >I imagine there are a great number of things that don't exist > that we never mention -- so why this one? Well because this one bilks money from people who usually can't afford to be giving it in the first place. It has over-reaching influence into my government, one that's supposed to be completely separate from it. > All rhetorical comments -- no need to reply. We all have different > beliefs -- whatever gets you through. That's my viewpoint to some extent, as long as it's not harming me then fine. But the truth is it is harming all of us. Do we really want our children taught about a magical sky-god who insists on genital mutilation at birth? Do we want influences into our governments that inhibit natural advances in modern science? Do you really believe in virgin birth and resurrection? -- Greg Donald http://destiney.com/