Re: RE: temprorary error

---- Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 00:56 +0000, Nathan Rixham wrote: > > Robert Cummings wrote: > > > On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 15:55 -0500, tedd wrote: > > >> At 7:38 PM +0100 2/24/08, Zoltán Németh wrote: > > >>> 2008. 02. 24, vasárnap keltezéssel 09.59-kor Mary Anderson ezt írta: > > >>>> Hey guys, > > >>>> Isn't this thread a bit OT? > > >>> well, for a php list sure it is... but not the first one, and it seems > > >>> to me that many members of the list are interested in it... > > >>> > > >>>> Anyway, as areligious person I have to say that I really do not > > >>>> like to hear religions trashed and smeared the way you are doing. And > > >>>> just for the record, we Quakers do not believe God tells us to kill > > >>>> people and we have no priests. > > >>> actually I think there was no trashing and smearing here, only some > > >>> decent talking about religion and some humor (the 'rewrite the > > >>> bible' > > >>> site) > > >> > > >> I'm sure you'll get an argument over the "no trashing and smearing > > >> here" claim. > > >> > > >> But, in your defense, you probably don't realize > > >> the disrespect shown, or that's perceived by > > >> others, regarding beliefs. > > >> > > >> It's a touchy subject and usually not one to > > >> discuss with a wide range of different beliefs, > > >> some of which hold other's beliefs in low esteem > > >> -- as does the 'rewrite the bible' site. > > >> Incidentally, which started the religious portion > > >> of this thread. > > >> > > >> I think we've about beat this to death > > > > > > Sooooooooo.... let's resurrect it!! *ducks and runs away cackling* > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Rob. > > > > you know looking through the list - I'm struggling to find a thread that > > rob's participated in and *not* had the last say on.. > > > > [can you resist?] > > No I can't resist. It would be tantamount to agreeing with you. Since I > disagree with you I feel compelled to answer your direct reference to > me. There are plenty of threads in which I've participated but for which > I am not the last say. Obviously you aren't capable of searching > properly or you have developed a bias against me for whatever reason. > *shrug*. > > Cheers, > Rob. > -- I vote he has a bias for your writing and notices threads dieing after your comments... What that says about him and/or your comments on threads is.. ;) I couldn't resist either. Wolf