Re: save image in database vs folder
| From: | David Giragosian | Date: | Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:34:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: save image in database vs folder | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-271284@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 3/11/08, Daniel Brown <parasane@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 11:18 +0000, Richard Heyes wrote:
> > > > some friend of mine ague about this matter, this morning. they say, saving
> > > > image in
> > > > database is more professional. I am not really agree with that,since i am
> > > > just a novice programmer.
> > >
> > > Well, bearing in mind I only have experience of MySQL, the general
> > > consensus is to save it to a file on you hard drive and store the file
> > > name in the database. If for whatever reason you can't or don't want to
> > > do that, then at least store it in a separate table that only gets
> > > touched when the image is requested.
> >
> > Can you point me to a link where I can read about this so-called
> > "general consensus"? :)
>
> http://www.gfy.com/ ;-P
Whoa! My institution blocked that URL for 'adult content'. I guess
there are some racy example pictures or something?? lol.
:=)
-David.
When the power of love
overcomes the love of power,
the world will know peace.
-Jimi Hendrix