Re: spider
| From: | Wolf | Date: | Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:30:32 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: spider | ||
| Groups: | php.general | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-271944@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
---- "Børge Holen" <borge@arivene.net> wrote:
> On Friday 21 March 2008 19:12:04 Wolf wrote:
> > ---- Daniel Brown <parasane@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Wolf <lonewolf@nc.rr.com> wrote:
> > > > In one word: CURL
> > > >
> > > > In another word: WGET
> > > >
> > > > Both are pretty effecitve and give pretty much the same results,
> > > > however with the CURL you can pass other things alone (user:pass) which
> > > > with wget you can not do.
> > >
> > > pilotpig@pilotpig.net [~/www/img]# wget --help|grep -i password
> > > --password=PASS set both ftp and http password to PASS.
> > > --http-password=PASS set http password to PASS.
> > > --proxy-password=PASS set PASS as proxy password.
> > > --ftp-password=PASS set ftp password to PASS.
> >
> > Nice, your guy's version of wget is better then mine! I tried that once
> > (granted that was years ago now that I think about it) and it keeled over
> > and died!
> >
> > OK, so I stand corrected there... But has anyone seen a PHP port of wget
> > or is curl the only one of the 2 which does it natively in a compiled
> > version of php with curl? :)
> >
> > If it works natively in PHP, then there are 2 choices and neither has to be
> > executed outside of PHP. :)
>
> so natively isn't alway the best.
> example: I've a hard time thinking php image handling is better than programs
> designed for it, neither in speed & accuracy/quality.
> lol notepad in windows ;D *ot but still a faint quantity of high altitude
> oxygene loss during easter*
> I've got to mention that I'm pretty unfamiliar with curl.
>
True, but some sites require natively running instead of running things via exec, system, etc...
Heck, I use Editpad, the version from circa 1993... ;)