RE: RE: RE: [PHP] Re: PUT vs. POST (was: php File upload)
| From: | Boyd, Todd M. | Date: | Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:07:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: RE: RE: [PHP] Re: PUT vs. POST (was: php File upload) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-277984@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Per Jessen [mailto:per@computer.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 1:17 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: RE: [PHP] Re: PUT vs. POST (was: php File upload)
>
> tedd wrote:
>
> >>Todd, I just wanted to stress that there is NO way for PHP to access
> >>anything on the client. The way you wrote it, you sort of implied
> >>that there might be other ways:
> >>
> >>"PHP by itself cannot access the local file system in a way that
> >>allows ..."
> >>
> >>That's all.
> >
> > The above is saying two different things.
> >
> > 1). "PHP by itself cannot access the local file system" <-- true.
> >
> > 2) "... there is NO way for PHP to access anything on the client."
> > <-- not true.
>
> Statement 2 _is_ 100% true. Sorry, end of discussion for my part.
I think there is a difference in definition going on here. An object in the local filesystem (though
not the original copy of it, but a facsimile rendered through Javascript) can be accessed from PHP,
though not in its original form, but wrapped in an AJAX request--or hidden INPUT tag, etc. (in the
form of encoded text)--and then manipulated.
That's what I *MEANT* to say. :P
Todd Boyd
Web Programmer