Re: FCKEditor, TinyMCE, ... I need a light weight WYSIWYG HTML Editor
| From: | afan pasalic | Date: | Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:13:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: FCKEditor, TinyMCE, ... I need a light weight WYSIWYG HTML Editor | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-278289@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Warren Vail wrote:
> A textarea is a simple editor, I am assuming you want something better than
> that, or you wouldn't have looked further.
>
I just tried Demo and got this:
"Sorry, you must have Internet Explorer 5.5 or higher to use the WYSIWYG
editor"
?!?
I'm using FF.
-afan
> Have you heard the expression (there is no free lunch), it applies here.
> Strictly speaking, a textarea is a wysiwyg editor, (what you see is what you
> get) you just don't see or get very much, one font, no formatting(other than
> what you can do with a carriage return, or a space bar).
>
> These editors can be very complex, but you do have some control in most of
> them to manage the complexity that you reveal to your users, and to do that
> you will have to know more about it than your users do (again, no free
> lunch).
>
> I like TinyMCE, it allows me to make sure that my users have a simple
> interface, and is real easy to setup (relative to developing the whole thing
> myself), but most of the ones you cite can probably fill that bill.
>
> Warren Vail
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mike [mailto:mike503@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 12:05 PM
>> To: AmirBehzad Eslami
>> Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
>> Subject: Re: [PHP] FCKEditor, TinyMCE, ... I need a light
>> weight WYSIWYG HTML Editor
>>
>> On 8/17/08, AmirBehzad Eslami <behzad.eslami@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear list,
>>>
>>> I'm looking for a light weight WYSIWYG HTML Editor to allow
>>>
>> users to
>>
>>> send private messages to each other in a forum application.
>>>
>>> FCKEditor is too complex and very huge for my purposes. I want a
>>> simple editor. What do you recommend?
>>>
>> WordPress has tweaked tinymce a lot to maintain <p> spacing
>> and code snippets and embedded objects. We've tried both at
>> my job with various configurations, both have had issues -
>> but we've had the most success and our users have been happy
>> with WordPress's configuration (which uses a couple custom
>> javascript things + specific tinymce
>> configuration)
>>
>> I've been trying to examine the differences so I can create a
>> reusable standalone component we can use in all our various
>> apps... but WP has hooked in a lot of custom code and it's
>> been a bit annoying trying to split it out into a single
>> reusable javascript file and stuff. Almost done though. I
>> went overboard and tried to make it more generic by renaming
>> and cleaning up the functions to not need any WordPress
>> callbacks and stuff and wound up messing it up, so I have to
>> go back again and probably re-create it from scratch.. Doh :)
>>
>> Honestly in a forum setting you can just give them a bbcode
>> howto/link on the side and let them put in their own bbcode
>> (which can be a strict subset of HTML) - or even just allow
>> HTML tags and limit what they can do. Loading up a
>> javascript-based thing even if it's pretty lightweight is
>> still annoying and I could see that being overkill for a forum.
>>
>> --
>> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To
>> unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>>
>
>
>