Re: About the magic function __call

My information was incomplete: I'm running php 5.1.2 (a requirement from the customer). I found this http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=42937 I "coded" this without testing, using only the idea. Thanks! Thanks for the help Nathan! 2008/8/27 Nathan Nobbe <quickshiftin@gmail.com> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Nathan Nobbe <quickshiftin@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Paulo Sousa <paulo.sousa.filho@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> ... >> > > this *should* work, > > here is a test, tests/classes/__call_005.phpt, you can take the part > beneath the --FILE-- section and see if it blows up on your system or not. > right now, im getting errors on a php5.2.5 system, and its working as > expected on a php5.2.6 system. > > --TEST-- > When __call() is invoked via ::, ensure private implementation of __call() > in superclass is accessed without error. > --FILE-- > <?php > class A { > private function __call($strMethod, $arrArgs) { > echo "In " . __METHOD__ . "($strMethod, array(" . > implode(',',$arrArgs) . "))\n"; > var_dump($this); > } > } > > class B extends A { > function test() { > A::test1(1,'a'); > B::test2(1,'a'); > self::test3(1,'a'); > parent::test4(1,'a'); > } > } > > $b = new B(); > $b->test(); > ?> > --EXPECTF-- > In A::__call(test1, array(1,a)) > object(B)#1 (0) { > } > In A::__call(test2, array(1,a)) > object(B)#1 (0) { > } > In A::__call(test3, array(1,a)) > object(B)#1 (0) { > } > In A::__call(test4, array(1,a)) > object(B)#1 (0) { > } > > also, i found in the code you posted, you are missing a 'function' in front > of doWhatever (cause a parse error, which is why i mention it); w/ the > following modification to your code, its running fine on a php 5.2.6 system, > and choking on 5.2.5; > > function __call($function, $args){ > var_dump($function); > var_dump($args); > $this->doWhatever(); > } > > private function doWhatever() { > } > > nathan@devel ~/unpack/php-5.2.6RC3/tests/classes $ php testOtherStuff.php > string(5) "drive" > array(1) { > [0]=> > string(7) "testing" > } > > -nathan > > (sorry for the long-winded post) >