Re: wrong behaviour with is_subclass_of() ??
| From: | Johannes Mueller | Date: | Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:58:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: wrong behaviour with is_subclass_of() ?? | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-280506@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Stut wrote:
But B is also no subclass of I - it just implements I as well as A. So there could be two possible straight solutions: 1. Neither A nor B is a subclass of I. 2. Both A and B are subclasses of I. Johannesoutputs: B implements I I would expect the following output: A implements I B implements IBecause there is a big difference between extends and implements, one of which being that the class is not considered to be a subclass of an interface it implements. Seems entirely logical to me.