Re: Re: strtotime

On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Ashley Sheridan <ash@ashleysheridan.co.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 19:46 +0100, gilles wrote: >> "Thodoris" <tgol@kinetix.gr> a crit dans le message de news: >> 4916BB77.9030609@kinetix.gr... >> > O/H Bastien Koert ??????: >> >> 2008/11/8 Maciek Sokolewicz <tularis@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> >> >>> gilles wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> Avec la version 4 de php, strtotime("20080950") fonctionne >> >>>> correctement >> >>>> en >> >>>> allant sur le mois d'octobre, alors qu'en version 5: 19700101. >> >>>> Merci de votre aide >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> This is an ENGLISH list, please rephrase your question in english and >> >>> people might understand. >> >>> >> >>> Cette liste est une liste anglaise, reformulent svp votre question en >> >>> anglais svp. >> >>> >> >>> merci, >> >>> >> >>> - Tul >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) >> >>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.phpm°(À >> >>> ÆÅSÏ3@O >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> I'll translate >> >> >> >> In PHP4, strtotime works fine >> >> >> > >> > Define "works fine". >> > >> >> in PHP5 strtotime gives a result of 19700101 when the data entered was >> >> strtotime("20080950") >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Linux >> > PHP version 5.1.6 >> > Apache 2 >> > >> > This strtotime("20080950") returns nothing. >> > >> > --- >> > Thodoris >> "Works fine" in php4 means >> date("d/m/Y",strtotime("20080950")) returns >> 20/10/2008, which is correct. >> Thanks >> >> >> > Which is actually incorrect (I've never seen the 50th of September) and > it was fixed in PHP 5. What you are assuming is correct behaviour is > actually a bug. > > > Ash > www.ashleysheridan.co.uk > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > I didn't read this thread (sorry) but I wonder if timezone/locale might be the culprit.