Re: More microptimisation (Was Re: [PHP] Variable as an index)
| From: | German Geek | Date: | Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:38:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: More microptimisation (Was Re: [PHP] Variable as an index) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-284992@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
agree, ++$i wont save u nething, it just means that the variable is
incremented after it is used:
$i = 0;
while ($i < 4) echo $i++;
will output
0123
while
$i = 0;
while ($i < 4) echo ++$i;
will output
1234
Tim-Hinnerk Heuer
http://www.ihostnz.com
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Nathan Nobbe <quickshiftin@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Clancy <clancy_1@cybec.com.au> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:20:09 +1100, dmagick@gmail.com (Chris) wrote:
> > ............
> > >I'd call this a micro-optimization. If changing this causes that much of
> > >a difference in your script, wow - you're way ahead of the rest of us.
> >
> > Schlossnagle (in "Advanced PHP Programming") advises:
> >
> > $i = 0; while ($i < $j)
> > {
> > ........
> > ++$i;
> > }
> >
> > rather than:
> >
> > $i = 0; while ($i < $j)
> > {
> > .......
> > $i++;
> > }
> >
> > as the former apparently uses less memory references. However I find it
> > very hard to
> > believe that the difference would ever show up in the real world.
>
>
> nonsense, some college kid is going to put ++$i on a test to try an impress
> the professor when the semantics call for $i++ :D
>
> -nathan
> p.s.
> in case you couldnt tell; been there, done that. lol
>