Re: Because you guys/gals/girls/women/insert pc term here are a smart lot
| From: | Richard Heyes | Date: | Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:26:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Because you guys/gals/girls/women/insert pc term here are a smart lot | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-285550@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
>>So where's the advantage of VARCHAR ?
>
> Less space on disc = less data retrieved from disc = faster data
> retrieval - sometimes. If you have small columns, a small number of
> rows, or both, then char columns may be faster. If you have large
> columns of varying actual length, lots of rows, or both, then varchar
> columns may be faster.
I still think a CHAR field would be faster than a VARCHAR because of
the fixed row length (assuming every thing else is fixed). Perhaps
someone from the MySQL list could clarify...?
--
Richard Heyes
HTML5 Graphing for FF, Chrome, Opera and Safari:
http://www.rgraph.org (Updated January 4th)