Re: Re: DB Comparisons
| From: | Nathan Rixham | Date: | Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:28:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: DB Comparisons | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-287747@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 21:03 +0000, Nathan Rixham wrote:only for the display tier in certain parts AFAIK, facebook had a good success using APC cache; however the bulk of their "applications" are certainly not php. ie: TIER 1 |-A : many many db serversrevDAVE wrote:Isn't Yahoo using PHP? I thought Facebook too? Doesn't seem like they moved away from a scripting language. Cheers, Rob.Hi Folks, I¹m curious if there are any previous discussions / Articles / URL¹s that compare the power and scalability of MySQL (with php) with other technologies like MS sequel server oracle - coldfusion etc.... I imagine that most middleware like php / asp / coldfusion is relatively good & fast - (let me know if one is better ). Mostly I¹m concerned with the speed and power of the backend database as to how it functions on an enterprise scale such as how many hits it can handle per hour how many users before it starts to slow down etc.honestly, if you're thinking enterprise scale then database is the least of you're worries, you'll be needing to move away from a scripting language and go for a pre compiled programming language.
| <------( cluster / distribution point)
v
|
|-B : distributed caches (like terracotta)
|-C : entity manager / persistence manager
|-D : domain model
TIER 2 |-E : business logic
|-F : app interface / web service interface
| <------( cluster / distribution point)
v
|
|-G : web service client
TIER 3 |-H : display interface
| <------( cluster / distribution point)
v
HTTP
|
CLIENT |-I : end user client (web browser)
that's vastly simplified with loads left out, a short time ago yahoo rolled out 40k new apache hadoop servers - you really think the just bolted a connector on the front ran a few php scripts then popped on some caching?
:-)