Re: long echo statement performance question

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Bruno Fajardo <bsfajardo@gmail.com> wrote: > I am so stick to Smarty that I never tried other solutions, like > Savant. Thanks for the tip, I'll try it right away. > > Cheers. > > 2009/2/6 Eric Butera <eric.butera@gmail.com>: >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Bruno Fajardo <bsfajardo@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Well, Smarty's caching layer is very fast. Maybe not as fast as an >>> echo statement, but apparentely Frank was also interested in separate >>> logic from presentation, and a series of echo's is not the best >>> solution in my opinion. :-) >>> But the best solution depends of the context of the application, i agree. >> >> Right on. I was just playing anyways. I'm a strong supporter of >> things like Savant & Zend_View. Use PHP, but for read only type of >> things with no logic. >> >> -- >> http://www.voom.me | EFnet: #voom >> > > > > -- > Bruno Fajardo - Desenvolvimento > bruno.fajardo@dinamize.com - www.dinamize.com > Dinamize RS - Porto Alegre-RS - CEP 90420-111 > Fones (51) 3027 7158 / 8209 4181 - Fax (51) 3027 7150 > > Dinamize BA - Lauro de Freitas - Fone 71 3379.7830 > Dinamize SC - Joinville - Fone 47 3025.1182 > Dinamize DF - Asa Norte - Brasília - Fone 61 3274.1172 > Dinamize SP - São Paulo - Fone 11 6824.6250 > Dinamize PR - Curitiba - Fone 41 3306.4388 > Dinamize RS - Caxias do Sul - Fone 54 3533.4333 > Dinamize RJ - Rio de Janeiro - Fone 21 2169.6311 > Keep in mind it won't keep people from running whatever code they want. It's more of a discipline you must enforce upon yourself and development team. It works out well for me though, but all requirements are different. -- http://www.voom.me | EFnet: #voom