Re: mysql_real_escape_string paranoid enough?
| From: | Robert Cummings | Date: | Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:52:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: mysql_real_escape_string paranoid enough? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-290513@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 15:37 -0700, mike wrote:
> 2009/3/21 Nisse Engström <news.NOSPAM.0ixbtqKe@luden.se>:
>
> > I tend to use the escape functions in very close proximity to
> > the actual query, so I don't see a problem with supplying a
> > connection identifier.
>
> Except unless explicitly specified, my applications do not require a
> connection identifier as it is stored in a global variable (I have a
> nifty little database access layer)
Yes, I'm a big fan of automatic database connection identifiers. Why
just the other week I was integrating ZenCart into another system and I
couldn't understand why ZenCart wasn't able to properly retrieve the
last_insert_id(). After digging throught he code I found it was because
they were making use of magic identifier semantics and since another db
connection also existed, it was being used for the last_insert_id().
Wonderful stuff. If you have a niftly little database layer, then it
shouldn't need magic semantics since it should track the connection
itself.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP