Re: Frameworks / obstinate?

Bob McConnell wrote:

However, don't limit it to classes. There are enough non-OO people that collections of usable function libraries should also be worth assembling. I would also suggest including unit test fixtures and utilities in any collection. Bob McConnell

Most functions can be wrapped in a class and probably should be for public distribution as it avoids function name clashes (though you still have class name clashes to worry about ...) If as a programmer you find a particular function nifty but don't care for the class, you can always rip it out of the class for your own use.