Re: Workflow app for software

On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 13:42 -0500, haliphax wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 13:30 -0500, haliphax wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:53 AM, bruce <bedouglas@earthlink.net> wrote: > >> > and haliphax... > >> > > >> > i specifically sent the reply to only you.. you then felt the need to reply > >> > to the list as a whole.... > >> > > >> > hmm.. ok.. this thread is officially dead!! > >> > > >> > unless of course it gets back to the initial question... > >> > > >> > peace!! > >> > > >> > > >> >> > -----Original Message----- > >> >> > From: haliphax [mailto:haliphax@gmail.com] > >> >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:38 AM > >> >> > To: php-general@lists.php.net > >> >> > Subject: Re: [PHP] Workflow app for software > >> > >> --8<-- > >> > >> >> Again, please do not top-post. It is the agreed-upon procedure in this > >> >> list to bottom-post when replying to threads. (I am not just going > >> >> "renegade thread-Nazi" on you.) > >> > > >> > Could you show me the signed agreement list. While it's convention on > >> > this list, it's certainly not something everyone agreed upon. > >> > >> To Rob, > >> I meant agreed-upon as in: it's been written... so somebody had to > >> agree to it up to the point that it was posted here - > >> > >> http://us3.php.net/reST/php-src/README.MAILINGLIST_RULES > > > > "It has been written" and "it has been agreed upon" are two completely > > different things. Many things have been written, few things are agreed > > upon. > > Unless the PHP development process has become a dictatorship, I'm > pretty sure more than one person decided it was a good idea before > putting it in the mailing list rules. Shall we discuss temporal proximity and relevance? Cheers, Rob. -- http://www.interjinn.com Application and Templating Framework for PHP