Re: Watermarking of images

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 18:53 -0400, PJ wrote: > Robert Cummings wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 16:31 -0400, tedd wrote: > > > >> At 3:48 PM -0400 5/12/09, Robert Cummings wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 09:54 -0400, tedd wrote: > >>> > >>>> At 12:27 PM -0700 5/11/09, Daevid Vincent wrote: > >>>> > > > Here's an example with code: > >>>> >> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > http://webbytedd.com/b/watermark/ > >>>> >> > >>>> >> I can't read the text over the dog's nose... ;) > >>>> > > >>>> >You're lucky. I don't see ANYTHING (as mentioned weeks ago > >>>> >already)... > >>>> > > >>>> >XP. FF 3.0.10 and IE 6. > >>>> > > >>>> >BOTH do not work. > >>>> > > >>>> >FF console says "startup is not defined" and "unknown > >>>> >property 'zoom'. > >>>> >declaration dropped." > >>>> > >>>> Daevid: > >>>> > >>>> Interesting, try again: > >>>> > >>>> http://webbytedd.com/b/watermark/ > >>>> > >>>> It works for me in IE6 and IE7 as well as FF on both XP and Vista. > >>>> > >>>> All I did was to remove the references to empty js and css files. > >>>> > >>> I think you missed the point of my comment about the black text over the > >>> dog's black nose. The whole thrust of this thread was to determine how > >>> to get the black outline around the text. The OP already had text on an > >>> image and I showed how to get an outline so that regardless of the image > >>> content the watermark would always be readable. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Rob. > >>> > >> Rob: > >> > >> I didn't miss it, I just didn't address that part of the post. Please > >> note -- the OP originally asked: > >> > >> [1] --- quote > >> > >>> That site is also coded in php so I'm guessing that the watermark is > >>> added using a php technology. > >>> > >>> Can someone enlighten me on how that is done? > >>> > >> -- unquote > >> > >> And: > >> > >> [2] --- quote > >> > >>> Also, while not php related, could someone enlighten me of a really > >>> good font to use for watermarking images? > >>> > >> -- unquote > >> > >> While your post dealt with [2] mine was addressing [1]. Understand? > >> > > > > Except he already had that part working. He wanted to get the outline. > > You would know that if you read the full post since he gave a link to > > what he already had using PHP. When he says: > > > > "That site is also coded in php so I'm guessing that the > > watermark is added using a php technology." > > > > It means that he can presumably also generate a watermark with an > > outline using PHP and GD. > > > > Comprendez vous? > > > That's "comprenez-vous?" Comprends-tu? ;-) That's why my kids are in French immersion :) But moving along... you did "understand" it ;) Cheers, Rob. -- http://www.interjinn.com Application and Templating Framework for PHP