Re: IRC and English

From: Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:48:01 +0000
Subject: Re: IRC and English
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-297589@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
At 2:02 PM -0700 9/1/09, Jessi Berkelhammer wrote:
As a monolingual North American, I am also very uncomfortable with this thread. A rant about abbreviations/IRC jargon is an appropriate discussion for list, but criticizing how non-native English speakers write English is not. This thread began with a mention of the "attitude" that non-native English speakers have, as if non-native English speakers are a unified group that are are more likely to have a bad attitude than native English speakers. Of course such a generalization could make people uncomfortable. -jessi tedd wrote:
At 11:16 AM -0300 9/1/09, Martin Scotta wrote:
As a non-english speaker I feel very uncomfortable with this thread.
You shouldn't feel uncomfortable because no one is talking about you.
As a fellow monolingual North American, I feel very uncomfortable about your statement as well. Does any other monolingual North American feel the same way as I do? Please expound on your feelings about this most disheartening and distasteful topic. (Boy has this thread degenerated into some politically correct bullsh#t, huh?) Look if you are not the one using "u" as a substitute for "you", then I don't see any support for the discomfort you may feel about this thread. But you are free to feel as it is your nature (shudder). If non-English users (or anyone else for that matter) want to use "u" for "you" that's fine -- but I'll refrain from helping them as well. I am sure that if I were writing in their language and shortened it to uncomprehending gibberish, I would receive the same treatment from them. Why is this so hard to understand -- am I using words that are two lengthy? Cheers, tedd -- ------- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com

« previous php.general (#297589) next »