Re: Native support to MS SQL Server

On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 09:15 -0400, Bastien Koert wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Ashley Sheridan > <ash@ashleysheridan.co.uk> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 09:06 -0400, Bastien Koert wrote: > > > > Would this be a good time to troll about the virtues of MySQL over > > > MSSQL? :p > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ash > > > http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk > > > > > > > > > > > > > It has virtues? > > > > -- > > > > Bastien > > > > Cat, the other other white meat > > > > Well, not being tied into using proprietary technology, being > able to use multiple database engines for different tables > within a single database, generally faster performance > (according to most tests,) ability to install the db server on > a wide variety of operating systems... Should I go on? > > > > Thanks, > Ash > http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk > > > > > > > No, no...it was sarcasm (which doesn't translate well in text) > > > > I am more than familiar with a variety of RDBMS and lets just say that > SQL Server is not at the top of my list of favorite things to play > with. > > > -- > > Bastien > > Cat, the other other white meat > Oh ok, lol. Yeah, I know the feeling. Myself I've only really used MSSQL and MySQL to any great lengths, and sometimes working with the former felt like I was pulling my own teeth! Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk