Re: HTML5 <aside> description
| From: | Robert Cummings | Date: | Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:44:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: HTML5 <aside> description | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-302001@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Michael A. Peters wrote:
If <aside> is not proper to use for this purpose, what would be? <sidebar> suggests a particular type of layout. <section> suggests content. <nav> is appropriate for some items in a side bar, but not all, and is often a child of how <aside> is being used. <div> give no semantics. I would like to see a <toc> tag for nav that serves as a table of contents of sorts (what I often have at the top of a side bar) but I suspect <nav> is considered sufficient. Maybe <sidebar> would be best, and the reference to column type layout can just be understood that isn't necessarily on the side? Reading up on it, I saw some suggest <figure> for what some of you want <aside> used for, but a <figure> is often important content and has its own meaning so that's not exactly appropriate.I would lean towards <div> if there is no appropriate semantic tag to markup the information. But in the case of ads, there really should be a n <ad> tag :) The problem though with semantic tags like <ad> is that it wouldn't be used in practice by most commercial sites, because then the browser would know exactly what to rip out (or at least plugins like adblock) *lol*. Cheers, Rob. -- http://www.interjinn.com Application and Templating Framework for PHP