Re: replying to list (I give up)

2010/4/21 David McGlone <david@dmcentral.net>: > On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:49 +0200, Peter Lind wrote: >> On 21 April 2010 14:38, Hans Åhlin <ahlin.hans@kronan-net.com> wrote: >> > Why change the way that has been around for years and adopted by >> > multiple e-mail lists? >> > It feels like it's more problem to change the way for thousands of >> > users just to satisfy a couple of few. >> >> David was venting based on a discussion in another thread. I'm pretty >> sure he knows about the option to reply-all - that's part of the >> reason for venting (it sends multiple emails instead of just the one >> needed). The optimal scenario is to: 1) be able to quickly respond to >> the list, as that's the normal action you want to do and 2) not spam >> people with several emails for no reason (i.e. avoid replying to the >> OP AND the list). > > Exactly. I also feel bad for those who have to pay to download per Mb, > GB, etc. > > It's pitiful that once I send this E-Mail, Peter and Hans both will get > 2 of the exact messages. > Strange I only got one, but it ma be a mail server filter > -- > Blessings, > David M. > >