Re: Secure Communication?

At 3:58 PM -0400 8/30/10, Paul M Foster wrote:

Is that about right? Other than the fact that this solution should be rife with latency issues, it seems like it would be secure. I assume you're doing this as an academic exercise. If you had an actual client who wanted to go to this much trouble to secure their data, I think I would opt for the previously suggested solution of getting a dedicated server or two. Paul

Paul: You got the method correct -- unfortunately, it's not as secure as I need. As for it being an "academic exercise", nothing is academic. If it works, it's implemented, if not, it isn't. That's what we do for a living. I will say it was learning experience, in that aspect it was "academic". :-) Cheers, tedd -- ------- http://sperling.com/