Re: Re: Copying an Object
| From: | David Hutto | Date: | Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:59:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Copying an Object | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-308274@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Gary <php-general@garydjones.name> wrote:
> Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>
>> Say you have two classes: human and male. Further, say male extends
>> human. Let's say you have a human object. Then later you want to make
>> that human object a male object. This seems to be a pretty reasonable
>> thing to request of our objects.
>
> I don't think any human can change gender without major surgery, but I
> don't know if you just chose your example badly or whether you really
> think objects should be able to mutate into other types of object
> without some kind of special treatment.
But it would work in something like makehuman, where you start with a neuter
form and scale one way or the other for physical features. If I
remember correctly,
we're' all xx until you become xy(genetically speaking).
>
>> This type of thing would especially be
>> easy if objects of parent classes could be cast as an object of its
>> extended class.
>
> Where would the extra data come from to fill in any fields the base
> class does not have? Just think of a simple example with a Shape class,
> extended by a ColouredShape class which contains some data about the
> object's colour - if you have a Shape object it can't become a
> ColouredShape without some surgery because bits of the ColouredShape's
> anatomy are not present.
>
> --
> Gary Please do NOT send me 'courtesy' replies off-list.
> PHP 5.2.12 (cli) (built: Jan 14 2010 14:54:11)
> 1.7.7(0.230/5/3) 2010-08-31 09:58 Cygwin
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>