Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Ben Brentlinger wrote: > her inbo > > On 11/1/ >> It's no >> sascha. >> box at >> >> Thanks, >> Ash >> http:// >> >> ----- R >> From: " >> Date: M >> Subject >> To: <ph >> >> it coul >> on thei >> gave yo >> might b > been >> known f > a >> bulk ma >> could b >> think o > malware >> from it >> have a > unauthor >> access >> server' >> that ca > sniffing >> script >> which w >> webhost > of >> shady c >> compani >> should > to, >> I'd rec >> > <http:// >> >> >> >> They're >> webhost >> webhost >> either >> >> On 11/1 >> > On Su >> > >> >> Is t >> >> malw >> >> >> >> Begi >> >> >> >>> Fro >> >>> Dat >> >>> To: >> >>> Sub >> >>> >> >>> Thi >> >>> >> >>> A m >> >>> >> >>> <ph >> >>> >> >>> cou >> >>> The >> >>> >> >>> <sa >> >>> >> >>> The >> >>> >> >>> <sa >> >>> >> >>> (wi >> >>> >> >>> --- >> >>> >> >>> Rec >> >>> by >> >>> >> > (envelop >> >>>> ) >> >>> id >> >>> for >> >>> Rec >> >>> by >> >>> >> > (envelop >> >>>> ) >> >>> id >> >>> for >> >>> Aut >> header. >> >>> ; d >> >>> Dom >> >>> X-D >> >>> dom >> >>> X-H >> >>> Rec > helo=lis >> >>> by >> >>> id >> >>> 201 >> >>> Rec > -0000 >> >>> Mai >> >>> Pre >> >>> lis >> >>> lis >> >>> lis >> >>> Lis >> >>> Del >> >>> Rec >> >>> -00 >> >>> Aut >> header. >> >>> ; s >> >>> Aut >> >>> smt >> >>> Rec >> >>> 209 >> >>> X-D >> >>> dom >> >>> X-P >> >>> X-H >> >>> DKI >> >>> >> >>> >> Not specifically at you Ben, but it's not much more than a week since Daniel Brown reminded everyone on this list that top-posting is against the list rules - Message-ID: <AANLkTimTjTmzfZRdEvX=o4aysE+gPhH9BZ4gfhNVeunT@mail.gmail.com>