Re: Problem with Include

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Daniel P. Brown <daniel.brown@parasane.net> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 02:48, Ravi Gehlot <ravi@ravigehlot.net> wrote: >> My point is that you tried to take code from one page and put it all >> "organized" in another page and the include that page of includes back into >> the pages that you want it to feed off from. If stuff works the way that it >> does then there a reason for it to have been done that way. > >    So you think no one should ever do that because it's only making > it look pretty?  Ever hear of maintainability? > >> That's why documenting code is so important. 99% doesn't do it (including me). > >    Please cite your source. Personally, I'd even have to admit mine was less than 99% compatible with what I'd like it to be. > > -- > </Daniel P. Brown> > Dedicated Servers, Cloud and Cloud Hybrid Solutions, VPS, Hosting > (866-) 725-4321 > http://www.parasane.net/ > -- They're installing the breathalyzer on my email account next week.