Re: Doctrine madness!
| From: | Eric Butera | Date: | Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:23:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Doctrine madness! | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-313592@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Jim Lucas <lists@cmsws.com> wrote:
> On 6/16/2011 3:15 PM, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>> what it really amounts to is php is good at doing 1 thing and 1 thing only,
>> generating web pages. for anything else, including command line scripts
>> that run for more than 30 seconds, choose an actual programming language or
>> be prepared to deal w/ hacky, disgusting workarounds.
>>
>
> Nathan,
>
> I would have to disagree with your statement about using PHP for applications
> that take more then 30 seconds or CLI scripts.
>
> I have a daemon (read: scripts) that I wrote using PHP. It listens on a few UDP
> sockets and maintains an open connection to mysql. It receives server updates
> and other client requests for data. When it receives a client update it updates
> a couple tables in mysql. When it receives a request from a server for data, it
> goes to mysql gets all needed data, compiles it into the format requested and
> sends it down the wire.
>
> This daemon starts when my system starts up. As of this morning it has been
> running non stop since Feb 28th (about 108 days). Between then and now it has
> received over 35M server updates and over 1.8M client requests. I think it gets
> used a bit.
>
> So, to say that doing anything with PHP that takes longer then 30 seconds to
> complete will require you to use hacky and disgusting workarounds is false.
>
> I have no hacks nor disgusting workarounds in my scripts. Combined the scripts
> total about 200 lines, over half of which is either comments or vertical white
> space.
>
> It has been running pretty much non-stop since August 2007 with minimal
> maintenance needed.
>
> Jim Lucas
>
Hello,
Impressive stats and has me a bit intrigued! Just out of curiosity,
does your daemon use a heavy amount of object orientation in it or is
it mostly procedural codebase?
Regards