Re: Top Posting
| From: | James Moe | Date: | Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:12:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Top Posting | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-313923@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/05/2011 07:48 AM, Jim Giner wrote:
> And besides - I'm sure there are PLENTY of people here who despise scrolling
> thru endless repeated paragraphs from a long list of posts just to get the
> the latest contribution to the topic. :)
>
I often do not bother to read posts from those how cannot trim all of
the irrelevant portions of a response. I have noticed that the response
is usually trivial and not worth scrolling to find.
> This newgroup may have its rules, but if bottom-posting was such a wise and
> preferred method, why do millions of business users subscribe to a product
> such as Outlook, that top-posts by default, to conduct their daily business
> via emails flying back and forth with the latest post at the beginning so
> that readers don't have to re-hash old news unless they want to?
>
I suspect one reason top posting is popular is that responders do not
have to think about tidying up, just spit out a reply and move on. The
result is a message that grows in size with every reply containing every
useless bit since the thread began. It becomes quite a mess.
- --
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk4TU/MACgkQzTcr8Prq0ZP2OwCfUj8Hw7cFkkYMey6EdknZ60/E
ahgAoJnaxil40kOqps1WhWF6lP6d/Ve5
=pedd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----