RE: Re: [PHP] pathinfo function
| From: | Ford, Mike | Date: | Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:09:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: Re: [PHP] pathinfo function | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-314216@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Streater [mailto:tim@clothears.org.uk]
> Sent: 27 July 2011 09:57
>
> On 26 Jul 2011 at 23:55, Micky Hulse <rgmicky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Tim Streater
> <tim@clothears.org.uk> wrote:
> >> that I will get an error if I try to reference $info["extension"]
> ??
> >
> > From what I can tell via reading the docs:
> >
> > "The following associative array elements are returned: dirname,
> > basename, extension (if any), and filename."
> > <http://php.net/pathinfo>
> >
> > Makes me think that if the extension does not exist, then the
> > "extension" key will not exist.
>
> Seems to me that's the case. However the doc is ambiguous,
> especially as I *asked* for that key to be returned. IMO it should
> exist and be empty. Not existing is only OK if I didn't ask for it.
>
This is how you tell the difference between a basename with a null
extension ("/path/filename.") and no extension ("/path/filename").
In the former case you get $info["extension"]=>"", in the latter
there is no ["extension"] element in the returned array.
This does seem like the most logical way to make this distinction,
but the manual could use a bit of work to document this and other
edge cases more explicitly.
Cheers!
Mike
--
Mike Ford,
Electronic Information Developer, Libraries and Learning Innovation,
Portland PD507, City Campus, Leeds Metropolitan University,
Portland Way, LEEDS, LS1 3HE, United Kingdom
E: m.ford@leedsmet.ac.uk T: +44 113 812 4730
To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm