Re: Sniping on the List

On Nov 18, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Robert Cummings wrote: > By you're reasoning since I did not exist before 1974 then time itself could not possibly > have existed before then either since I was not in existence to perceive it. That's as > ludicrous as suggesting time did not exist before the big bang (presuming this model is correct). > Also, them's some fancy shmancy words you're slinging about up there, but without a proof > it's just farts in the wind :) No more valid than a theory of creation or the big ass spaghetti > thingy majingy dude. Folded shmeality and phases of whatsyamacallit may well be true, but > provability of the non-existence of time before the big bang theory is not provable by this model. > However, what is valid is to take a point of reference in time and infer a period before it. Thus > before the big bang is perfectly valid whether we could perceive it or not. > > Cheers, > Rob. Again, you have shown an uncanny insight into the way things are. :-) Cheers, tedd _____________________ tedd@sperling.com http://sperling.com