Re: Re: http_referer. what's wrong with that?
| From: | Stuart Dallas | Date: | Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:16:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: http_referer. what's wrong with that? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-316272@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 12 Jan 2012, at 14:10, Jonesy wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:11:25 +1100, Ross McKay wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:27:58 -0800, Haluk Karamete wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>> Notice: Undefined index: HTTP_REFERER in
>>> D:\Hosting\5291100\html\blueprint\bp_library.php on line 16
>>> die;
>>> [...]
>>> But I'm still curious, what configuration am I missing so that
>>> http_referer is treated like that?
>>
>> You only get an HTTP_REFERER when you link to a page from another page.
>> If you go directly to the page, e.g. by typing / pasting the URL into
>> the location bar, ...
>
>> ... or linking from an email, then there is no HTTP_REFERER.
>
> Not so. It depends. A number of email programs of the
> HTML-email-abomination ilk send referrers. I just completed
> some log scans to verify an 'issue' with AOL sessions, and their
> email contraption _does_ send a referrer. I've seen others, as well.
>
> "74.93.226.126" - - [14/Oct/2011:21:08:50 +0000] "GET /UBSC/ HTTP/1.1"
> 200 4502
> "http://mail.aol.com/34188-111/aol-6/en-us/Suite.aspx"
> "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; ........
One point of clarity... the browser sends the referrer header, not the page that contains the link,
whether it's a simple website or an application. Websites have absolutely no control over it.
-Stuart
--
Stuart Dallas
3ft9 Ltd
http://3ft9.com/