Re: including PHP code from another server..

From: Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:30:43 +0000
Subject: Re: including PHP code from another server..
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-317278@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I understand what performance issues this brings, but as for security was just a bit curious. You have just showed me what I was thinking about, but you wrote it much better, clear and structured. Thank you. 2012/3/26 Stuart Dallas <stuart@3ft9.com>: > On 26 Mar 2012, at 17:41, Alex Pojarsky wrote: > >> Now, as the issue adressed and script removed, can you please explain >> what exactly are the issues of using such approach? I mean security >> ones, not performance. > > It's the wrong solution to a process and organisation problem. Ultimately it's not > really a problem IF you control every part of the infrastructure. Rene clearly doesn't so it > has implications for everyone sharing that infrastructure, and anyone using the applications hosted > there. > > * It requires the host to enable allow_url_fopen which means every single script on the server > is then able to include/require URLs. It just needs one of them to have a related vulnerability and > suddenly people can execute arbitrary PHP code on the server. > > * Rene mentioned that the code is open source. This implies that the security risk is lessened > because the code that is being made publicly accessible is already publicly accessible, so the > opportunity for someone to find vulnerabilities already exists. It gets an order of magnitude worse > if other people start ignorantly using his code because they're essentially giving him the > ability to execute arbitrary PHP code on their server. Not good no matter how much he protests that > he won't "be evil." > > * You specifically wished to exclude performance from the discussion, but scalability is > potentially a big issue here and should not be completely ignored. > > I think the real issue for Rene is that of perceived complexity. The idea of having to manually > keep many copies of the same code in sync is what leads to finding solutions like this one. This > solution leads to unnecessary network traffic and introduces potential security risks that go way > beyond your own code, and even if it's not a big issue now it has the potential to become > catastrophic! > > I'd put a fair amount of cash on my guess that Rene is not using any form of source > control. To me that is the best solution to this problem. Curtis mentioned rsync which will also do > the job, but in my view you're nuts if you're not using some form of source control > already, and building a largely automated process around that is trivial and automatically audited. > > Rene: please read a book / website / something on PHP security. Some things are important > whether you believe they are or not. > > -Stuart > > -- > Stuart Dallas > 3ft9 Ltd > http://3ft9.com/

« previous php.general (#317278) next »