Re: Re: limiting
| From: | Ashley Sheridan | Date: | Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:26:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: limiting | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-319413@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 14:53 -0400, David McGlone wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 07:36:00 PM Tim Streater wrote:
> > On 10 Oct 2012 at 19:17, David McGlone <david@dmcentral.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> BTW - in any of your other computer languages didn't they utilize a
> > >> 'return' statement? PHP's is no different.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > back in like '85, I learned Pascal that's the only language I learned and
> > > I
> don't recall if it used return.
> >
> >
> > Mmmm. There's the problem. Pascal doesn't *have* a return statement. In
> > Pascal, implicitly, you return when execution reaches the end of a
> > function. In fact the same is true of PHP and JavaScript, but in those
> > languages you can return early just by saying return.
>
> > IMO, this is a major limitation of Pascal. I use returns wherever I feel
> > like it - if I detect there's nothing more for the function to do, I
> > return. Purists object to this; they say you should enter a function at one
> > place and leave at one place. Well, that's a point of view. But more often
> > that not it just leads to convoluted code in order to achieve that. The one
> > time I *had* to use Pascal as that was the only option, I simply put a 999:
> > label at the end of the function and did goto 999 wherever I wanted to do a
> > return. Simples!
>
> goto was the thing that got on my nerves. Even to this day I hate that word
> with a passion.
>
>
I think most people do, all but BASIC purists!
--
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk