Re: Beneficial site spamming framework
| From: | Ashley Sheridan | Date: | Sat, 13 Oct 2012 07:24:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Beneficial site spamming framework | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-319442@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 08:57 +0200, Maciek Sokolewicz wrote:
> On 13-10-2012 01:55, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 01:59 +0200, Maciek Sokolewicz wrote:
> >
> >> On 11-10-2012 22:18, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >>>>> I've been getting spam comments on my personal blog (runs on
> >>>>> self-written PHP blog software). I'd like to test some methods
> >>>>> I've
> >>>>> devised to prevent or block it. Does anyone know of a very
> >>>> lightweight
> >>>>> framework for simulating an automated "form fill-out" on a site?
> >>>>> Something where you could just add some code to designate the site
> >>>> for
> >>>>> the "attack" and then what fields you wanted to send?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This should be a relatively simple task for PHP and curl, but I'm not
> >>>>> really familiar with the headers and that part of the HTTP
> >>>> conversation.
> >>>>> Yes, I know this is a risky question for a public list. Feel free to
> >>>>> contact me privately if you think the answer shouldn't be in the
> >>>>> archives of a public list. Likewise, if you can point me to a source
> >>>> of
> >>>>> quickly absorbable research on the subject. I frankly don't know how
> >>>> I'd
> >>>>> google such a thing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Paul
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Paul M. Foster
> >>>>> http://noferblatz.com
> >>>>> http://quillandmouse.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, visit:
> >>>>> http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>> To avoid having to create your own anti-spam system, I recommend Akismet, which
> >>> weights posts allowing you to set a rejection threshold. The great thing is that it is constantly
> >>> improving over time.
> >>>
> >> I've recently looked into the more modern captcha systems. I personally
> >> can't stand the "standard" captcha of having to decipher what
> >> characters
> >> are present on a distorted image. The last few years I've noticed that
> >> more and more often I can't decipher what an image is supposed to say.
> >> And after a few tries of unsuccesful replying what the image says, I
> >> just give up. This seems to be a reverse-Turing-test by now. Computers
> >> being able to guess better than humans.
> >>
> >> Anyway, I wrote my own captcha system. I've noticed that simple things
> >> like "what is the capital of the USA?" and then being able to choose
> >> "Hong-Kong, Washington or Rome" or a question like "Is water wet or
> >> dry?" work very very well. Just make up a bunch of these, and then
> >> randomly pick one to have people answer on your blog. It completely
> >> stopped registration spam on my forum. Simply because bots don't
> >> understand such questions.
> >>
> >> - Tul
> >
> >
> > There's a slight irony that this message got posted to the list 5 times,
> > given the topic :p
> >
> Haha, good point. I forgot to remove half of the reply-to addresses from
> the message (thus sending it to both the newsgroup and the mailinglist);
> still that should send it only twice, not 5 times(??). Oh well... :)
>
> - Tul
I think it might be an issue with your email client/server, as this one
just came through 3 times too!
--
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk