Re: rather a HTML Q; however 2-FRAME

From: Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 01:17:43 +0000
Subject: Re: rather a HTML Q; however 2-FRAME
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-320594@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Jim Giner <jim.giner@albanyhandball.com> wrote: > On 3/15/2013 10:11 AM, georg wrote: >> >> Actually I think you are right; >> >> what I would have liked (as a natural extension of the depression....:) >> is actually a <FRAME> tag that stands without the <FRAMESET> >> and which as target="framename" instead of the frame defining >> name="framename" >> and which just displayed the src in that frame (immediatly as it does >> today) >> >> Im fairly new to PHP so Im bound to bounce into some walls, tnx. >> >> BR georg > > > And apparently new to html as well if you want to use frames still :) > Why not learn "just a little" css and html and develop something more > current that you won't be re-visiting down the road some time and changing? > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > Although maybe there's something ascetic about going through features from the beginning and learning to hate them as much as we did.

« previous php.general (#320594) next »