Re: PHP vs JAVA
| From: | Stuart Dallas | Date: | Tue, 20 Aug 2013 21:02:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP vs JAVA | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-321932@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 20 Aug 2013, at 22:00, Ashley Sheridan <ash@ashleysheridan.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 21:44 +0100, Stuart Dallas wrote:
>> On 20 Aug 2013, at 21:30, Dan Munro <dan@danmunro.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >> in my opinion, that would be like asking "how big is the internet?".
>> >
>> >
>>
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/08/18/heres-what-you-find-when-you-scan-the-entire-internet-in-an-hour/
>>
>>
>> That's scanning IP addresses and doesn't come close to answering "how big is
>> the internet," assuming that means how many sites are there rather than how many publicly
>> responsive edge servers exist.
>>
> I'd argue that a large proportion of really secure servers out there won't respond to
> a lot of what Zmap pings out. Nmap works by throwing out requests on a bunch of different ports, not
> just ping, which is slow, so I'd be surprised if Zmap could really rival that while giving the
> same results. Bearing in mind there are over 4,000 million (I won't say billion, because
> that's a million million, despite what the Americans say!) IPv4 address out there, 40 minutes
> is a ridiculous amount of time to even scan half of that, especially given the fact that IPv6 is
> being majorly pushed because IPv4 is apparently running out of free address space! Then not
> forgetting that lots of websites exist on the same IP address/range, I would say the article is
> lacking on so many details as to be untrue.
I wouldn't go so far as to say it's untrue, but it's certainly written with
exaggerated implications.
-Stuart
--
Stuart Dallas
3ft9 Ltd
http://3ft9.com/