Re: Re: Which function returns a correct ISO8601 date?

Hi, Alessandro Would it be worth noting somewhere, that these two implementations of ISO8601 differ? Because I needed the DateTime::ATOM way to save the timezone ... Even so the other one was also about ISO 8601 ... My system is working towards a search-engine called ElasticSearch. This one makes use of a Java method to format a date. This one is defined here: http://joda-time.sourceforge.net/api-release/org/joda/time/format/ISODateTimeFormat.html#dateOptionalTimeParser%28%29 The definition for a time-offset is defined like this: offset = 'Z' | (('+' | '-') HH [':' mm [':' ss [('.' | ',') SSS]]]) Is there a format, you know of, that makes this difference (colon or not) bullet-prove? Bye, Simon On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Alessandro Pellizzari <alex@amiran.it> wrote: > On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 14:47:00 +0200, Simon Schick wrote: > >> The method date("c") actually formats a date, fitting to the format >> defined in the constant DateTime::ATOM. >> >> Are both formats (with and without colon) valid for ISO8601, or is the >> documentation for the method date() wrong? > > Yes: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601#Time_zone_designators > > Bye. > > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >