Re: Why PHP sucks - farce or is there a bit of truth?
| From: | Tamara Temple | Date: | Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:59:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Why PHP sucks - farce or is there a bit of truth? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-322305@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Ternary operator works the same in every language I've encountered… you can expand every such
statement to an if-then-else if it makes you feel better. Not every operator in math is transitive,
either. a - b is not the same as b - a, for example.
On Oct 17, 2013, at 7:51 PM, Tim-Hinnerk Heuer <th.heuer@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, but when you add stuff it gets the same result from left to right as
> from right to left.
> So, the ternary operator is more related to logic, even though logic
> belongs to math.
>
> Tim-Hinnerk Heuer
>
> Twitter: @geekdenz
> Blog: http://www.thheuer.com
>
>
> On 18 October 2013 13:49, Daniel <danielx386@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Tim-Hinnerk Heuer <th.heuer@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been a PHP programmer for several years now and have a bit of a
>>> love-hate relationship with it. It's great for doing something quickly,
>>> especially web stuff, but recently I have heard people moaning about PHP
>> a
>>> lot and did some research and found this:
>>>
>>> http://webonastick.com/php.html
>>>
>>> One thing I had to get my head around is this:
>>> The ternary operator
>>> <?php
>>> $foo = 1;
>>> print(($foo == 1) ? "uno" : ($foo === 2) ? "dos" :
>>> "tres");
>>> print("\n");
>>>
>>> outputs
>>>>> dos
>>>
>>> because the operator is left-to-right associative instead of
>> right-to-left
>>> as in other languages. I was thinking there must be a reason for this.
>>> Speed? Is it faster to evaluate/implement all operators as left-to-right?
>>>
>>> I noticed that the above could easily be fixed by saying:
>>>
>>> <?php
>>> $foo = 1;
>>> print(($foo == 1) ? "uno" : (($foo === 2) ? "dos" :
>>> "tres"));
>>> print("\n");
>>>
>>> outputs
>>>>> uno
>>>
>>> Was this a deliberate design decision or is it a flaky implementation of
>>> the ternary operator?
>>>
>>> Tim-Hinnerk Heuer
>>>
>>> Twitter: @geekdenz
>>> Blog: http://www.thheuer.com
>>
>>
>> Maybe it just me but I look at it the same as math, you don't add
>> something up from right to left do you?
>>